Content Creators Archives /Tag

Can User-Generated Content Trigger an ADA Demand Letter?
Reviews. Comments. Community posts. Q&A threads. Uploaded photos. Customer-submitted listings.

If your website includes user-generated content (UGC), you already know one truth: your content changes faster than any single QA pass can keep up with. And that’s where a very real business concern kicks in:

It’s the same question behind a lot of ADA demand letters and accessibility complaints: if someone else posts it, does it still fall on you?

Short answer: It can.

A longer (and more useful) answer: UGC usually isn’t the only reason a business gets an ADA demand letter, but it can absolutely strengthen a complaint—especially when it blocks participation, creates barriers on high-traffic pages, or shows up inside key buying or support experiences.

Before we go further: this article is informational, not legal advice. If you receive a demand letter or legal threat, it’s smart to involve qualified counsel.

Now let’s unpack the real issue behind the question: the risk depends on where UGC appears, how it’s created, and what control your platform gives you.

What User-Generated Content Is and Where It Shows Up

User-generated content is anything your users create instead of your internal team. That includes reviews, comments, forum posts, Q&A answers, uploaded photos, listings, profiles, and all the little pieces people add to your site as they interact with it.

But here’s the part that catches most teams off guard:

UGC isn’t one thing. And it definitely doesn’t behave the same everywhere it appears.

Some UGC sits inside clean templates and barely shifts. Some shows up as long, free-form posts with images and embeds. And some becomes full pages that search engines crawl and customers rely on. Each of those patterns carries a different level of accessibility exposure.

Light UGC Explained

Light UGC is the easiest to keep stable. Think short reviews, star ratings, or a simple comment thread. These usually live inside structured components, so the content itself doesn’t wander too far.

What does wander?

The widgets around it.

A star-rating tool that doesn’t work with a keyboard, a comment form missing labels, or a “load more” button with no name—all of that can cause more trouble than the content itself ever would.

Rich UGC and Accessibility

Rich UGC gives users more room to shape the experience. That includes long posts, formatted text, uploaded images, embedded videos, and external links.

Freedom is great for expression. It’s less great for predictability.

One user uploads an image with text baked in. Another pastes an embed that traps keyboard focus. Someone else writes a long post using bold text as fake headings. Suddenly, your page has structure on the surface but not in the markup where assistive tech looks for it.

Structural UGC and Exposure

Structural UGC is where things move from “content” to “actual pages.” These are profiles, listings, job posts, directory entries, marketplace items—anything that functions like a standalone page and attracts search traffic.

This is the kind of UGC that matters most for accessibility risk because it doesn’t sit quietly in a small section. It becomes part of the paths people use to make choices, complete tasks, or decide whether your product fits their needs.

When structural user-generated content is inconsistent or hard to navigate, the impact shows up fast.

Where User-Generated Content Lives (and Why Placement Matters)

The biggest shift in risk isn’t the content—it’s where the content lands.

A slightly messy review on a low-traffic page may not change much. But that same review sitting inside a product page with heavy purchase intent? Different story. And the same is true across the site.

UGC becomes more consequential when it appears in places like:
- Product pages with reviews, photos, or Q&A
- Service pages with before/after uploads
- Location or listing pages that customers rely on to compare options
- Support threads and community answers that function as your “real” FAQ
- Profiles or listings that act like landing pages and show up in search results
All of these are places where people come to decide something. If the UGC in those areas is inaccessible—or if the tools that publish it create predictable failures—that can turn into a barrier for someone trying to participate or complete a task.

Here’s the part most businesses miss:

The risk isn’t just the content users post. It’s the system your platform uses to collect it, shape it, and display it.

The templates, editors, upload flows, moderation tools, and UI patterns are where most preventable accessibility issues start. When those pieces aren’t designed with accessibility in mind, even simple UGC can become part of a complaint.

And once UGC becomes part of the user journey, it becomes part of the accessibility equation—especially when an ADA demand letter points to barriers on real pages people depend on.

How User-Generated Content Factors Into Website Accessibility Complaints

At a high level, here’s what matters:

ADA Title III focuses on equal access and non-discrimination for goods and services offered by businesses open to the public.

Even though the ADA doesn’t spell out one single required web standard for private businesses, accessibility claims often point to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) as the measuring stick in practice. WCAG evaluates pages as they are delivered to users—meaning all visible content, including UGC, can contribute to non-conformance.

And this is where UGC gets tricky.

Responsibility for UGC Accessibility Issues

If the content is on your domain, inside your customer journey, and presented as part of your experience, then it functions like part of the service you’re offering.

That doesn’t mean every single user mistake equals an automatic lawsuit. But it does mean the experience can become a valid complaint when barriers prevent people from completing tasks or participating fully.

How WCAG Evaluates UGC on Pages

WCAG conformance is evaluated based on what’s actually on the page. That includes:
- Content
- UI components
- Third-party widgets
- User-generated content
WCAG also recognizes the concept of partial conformance when certain issues are truly outside the author’s control. But partial conformance is not a shield you hide behind—it’s a disclosure approach, and a sign you should reduce what’s out of your control wherever possible.

A useful comparison: the DOJ’s Title II website accessibility factsheet for public entities highlights that third-party content can still be part of a covered service when it’s baked into the experience. Title II and Title III are different, but the principle is instructive:

If people rely on it to access the service, it needs to be accessible.

So yes—UGC can increase risk. But it doesn’t do it randomly. It does it in predictable ways tied to control and foreseeability.

How User-Generated Content Can Create Accessibility Barriers

Let’s break this into a simple framework you can actually use.

Barriers From Inaccessible UGC Tools

This is the category that gets businesses into trouble fastest—because it’s not “user behavior.” It’s your platform UI.

Examples:
- Review/comment forms are missing labels
- Error messages that aren’t programmatically connected to fields
- Star-rating widgets that can’t be used with a keyboard
- Upload buttons with no accessible name (“button button”)
- No status updates during upload (screen reader users stuck guessing)
- Rich text editors that trap focus or don’t announce controls properly
- Captcha or anti-spam tools that block assistive tech users
If someone can’t post, submit, edit, or participate because the controls aren’t accessible, that’s a strong accessibility barrier. And it’s directly attributable to the business experience—not the user’s content.

If your UGC system prevents participation, that can absolutely support an ADA demand letter.

Foreseeable Accessibility Failures

This is where many businesses accidentally create “accessibility debt” at scale.

Examples of foreseeable failures from UGC:
- Users upload images without providing any alt text.
- Links labeled only as “click here,” offering no context.
- Flyers or announcements as images with all the text baked in.
- Users choose font colors or backgrounds that create contrast failures.
- Visual formatting—like bold text—to imitate headings instead of using proper structure.
- Using emojis as bullet points or even headings without adding a text equivalent.
If a system consistently produces inaccessible pages, it’s hard to argue the issue is “random user behavior.”

Platform defaults shape outcomes.

And if the outcome repeatedly blocks access, that’s a foreseeable risk—exactly the kind of pattern that shows up in accessibility complaints.

When User-Generated Content Stops Key Tasks

Sometimes, the UGC isn’t “broken” in an obvious way. It’s just in the wrong place.

When the content shows up in the same high-value areas—product pages, listings, community answers, support information—the stakes rise fast. These are the pages people rely on to make choices, compare options, understand requirements, and get support.

Even if your official content is accessible, the user journey is what counts.

If UGC becomes the deciding factor, someone needs to:
- Choose a product
- Confirm compatibility
- Understand sizing or ingredients
- Access instructions
- Troubleshoot an issue
- Get help without calling
…and if that UGC is inaccessible, it can become part of the access barrier.

How to Make User-Generated Content Accessible by Design

This is where accessibility becomes realistic. Because the goal is not to make every user into an expert.

The goal is to build a system where the easiest path is also the most accessible path.

Build Accessible UGC Submission Tools

Treat your UGC publishing experience like a product, not an afterthought.

At minimum:
- Every input has a clear label.
- Keyboard-only users can complete the flow.
- Focus order is logical
- Errors are clear, specific, and programmatically tied to fields.
- Buttons announce what they do.
- Upload state changes are announced (progress, success, failure)
If your creation tools fail, the experience fails—no matter how good your main site is.

Prompt Users for Necessary Details

For image uploads, use an alt text prompt that’s friendly and short. For example:
- A required/optional alt text field depending on context
- A helper line like: “Describe what matters in this photo.”
- A checkbox: “This image is decorative” (when appropriate)
This single prompt eliminates a huge portion of predictable failures.

And yes—this is your responsibility. Because you control the workflow.

Limit Risky Formatting Options

This one surprises people, but it’s important:

If users can style content however they want, your site can become non-conforming instantly.

Practical guardrails:
- Limit text colors and backgrounds to approved combinations.
- Block low-contrast combinations automatically.
- Provide headings/lists as structured tools, not “fake formatting.”
- Prevent users from creating “headings” by just increasing font size.
If a page can be made inaccessible through user styling, that’s a platform design decision—not a user obligation.

Managing Rich Media Accessibility

If users upload video or audio:
- Prompt for captions and/or transcripts
- Offer a “pending accessibility” state
- Add a follow-up workflow to complete accessibility after posting.
- Provide a clear way to edit and add accessibility later.
Even a basic process here reduces risk dramatically.

Maintaining Accessible User-Generated Content Over Time

Even with solid guardrails, user-generated content keeps moving. New posts show up, trends change, and older content stays live in the places people rely on. So the goal isn’t “fix it once.” It’s keeping the system steady.

Check the templates that carry the most weight

Pick a small set of UGC-heavy templates—product pages, listings, support threads, community Q&A—and review them on a regular cadence. If a component update breaks keyboard flow, labels, or focus, you want to catch it before it spreads.

Give your team a simple playbook.

Moderators and content teams don’t need to learn WCAG. They just need a short list of patterns to flag, like missing alt text, image-based announcements, unclear link text, or embeds that don’t work with a keyboard.

Make reporting and fixes easy.

Add a straightforward way to report accessibility issues, and route those reports to someone who can act. When something needs remediation, start with the least disruptive fix—add text equivalents, correct formatting, or adjust the template so the issue doesn’t keep reappearing.

At the end of the day, WCAG looks at what’s on the page as delivered. If UGC lives in the experience, it’s part of what users have to work with—so it needs ongoing care.

Making User-Generated Content a Strength, Not a Liability

User-generated content will always shift and surprise you a little, and that’s fine. What matters is knowing your site can handle those shifts without creating new barriers every time someone posts a review or uploads a photo. When the basics are solid—the tools, the guardrails, the way you spot issues—you don’t have to brace for impact. Things stay steady.

If you want help looking at the parts of your site where UGC and accessibility meet, 216digital can walk through those areas with you and point out what will actually make a difference. When you’re ready, schedule an ADA briefing with 216digital and put a clear, manageable plan in place so accessibility stays reliable as your UGC grows.
Greg McNeil

January 21, 2026

Legal Compliance

Accessibility, Content Creators, Content Writing, Demand Letters, Legal compliance, User-Generated Content, WCAG, Website Accessibility
Say More with Accessible Web Content
We spend a lot of time tuning headlines and chasing algorithms. But the work that truly moves the needle is simpler: say what you mean so more people can use it. Clear content builds trust, lowers support requests, and makes your message easier to find. That’s the power of accessible web content—it helps people first, and performance follows.

Content isn’t a “design extra” in accessibility. Writers, editors, marketers, and developers shape how people understand a page. This article offers practical, jargon-light techniques you can apply right now. They align with WCAG, but they’re written for real teams on real deadlines, with real audiences who just want answers that make sense.

Plain Language Is the Heart of Accessible Web Content

Plain language is not “dumbing it down.” It’s respect. Many public-facing teams aim for an elementary reading level; professional material often targets a middle-school level. And when you’re busy, simple always wins—whether you’re a novice or an expert scanning on a phone between meetings.

Try this:
- Use a readability tool (Hemingway, Grammarly) to check grade level.
- Swap jargon for everyday words. “The site adjusts to your screen” beats “utilizes responsive design principles.”
- Prefer active voice: “Change your password every three months,” not “It is recommended…”
- Lead with the point, then add detail.
- Keep one idea per paragraph. Use person-first, inclusive language when you reference people with disabilities.
Short sentences steady the pace. A few longer ones add rhythm and nuance. Together, they make meaning land without strain.

Make Your Page Easy to Scan—By People and Tools

Titles, URLs, and headings are how busy readers—and assistive tech—map a page. If the map is messy, the journey is slow.

Best practices:
- Write unique, descriptive titles. Put the most important words first and, when it fits, match the H1.
- Use readable URLs (/web-design-services, not ?id=47289).
- Use one H1. Nest headings in order (H2 → H3) like chapters and subchapters.
Screen reader users often navigate by headings. A logical outline turns scanning into understanding. Clear structure makes pages easier to skim, and it makes accessible web content faster to find, reuse, and maintain.

Links and Images That Strengthen Accessible Web Content

“Click here” makes people guess. It also fails when a screen reader pulls out a list of links with no surrounding context.

Instead:
- Write link text that stands on its own: “Download the accessibility guide.”
- Make labels unique so users know which link goes where.
Effective Alt Text

Alt text explains an image’s purpose when images don’t load or when a user can’t see them.

Guidelines:
- Be concise—under ~125 characters—and capture what the image means to the page.
- Decorative images should be skipped with empty alt text (alt="").
- For complex visuals (charts, infographics), add a short alt summary and provide a fuller explanation nearby.
These small choices help everyone—search engines, skimmers, and people using assistive tech—get the same story.

Accessible Audio and Video for Every Situation

Not everyone can turn on sound. Some people prefer reading. Others are in a noisy shop or a quiet office. Without captions or transcripts, they miss your message.

Do this:
- Provide accurate, synchronized captions. Add speaker labels when voices change.
- Offer transcripts with timestamps and descriptions of meaningful sounds or visuals.
- Edit auto-generated captions. They’re a starting point, not a finish line.
Captions and transcripts travel well across devices and contexts, turning media into content that’s flexible, shareable, and dependable—another pillar of accessible web content.

Guidance That Doesn’t Assume Vision or Memory

Task-heavy pages—forms, checkouts, dashboards—depend on clear instructions. Plain direction removes guesswork and stress.

Practical moves:
- Use direct, concrete prompts: “Enter your full name and email address.”
- State rules up front: “Password must be at least 8 characters.”
- Write helpful errors that explain what went wrong and how to fix it: “Enter a valid email, like name@example.com.”
- Don’t rely on color, location, or shape alone. If you say “the green button on the right,” also name the button.
The goal is guidance that stands on its own—no color key, no guessing, no hidden requirements.

Formatting That Keeps Accessible Web Content Readable

Good layout choices help everyone. They also keep cognitive load low.

Recommendations:
- Left-align text. Full justification can create rivers of space that are harder to read.
- Choose legible sans-serif fonts at a comfortable size (around 16px / 12pt or larger).
- Give text room to breathe with generous line spacing and white space.
- Keep paragraphs short (3–4 sentences). Use lists for steps and grouped ideas.
- Verify pages remain readable and usable when zoomed to 200%.
- Ensure sufficient color contrast (aim for at least 4.5:1 for normal text). Don’t rely on color alone for meaning.
These choices signal care. They tell readers, “We made room for you here.”

Why These Techniques Matter

WCAG 2.2 (W3C’s current recommendation) gives teams a shared yardstick. The POUR framework—Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust—turns good writing habits and clean structure into checks you can actually verify. Here’s how that plays out in day-to-day work:
- Perceivable: Make meaning available beyond sight alone. 1.1.1 Non-text Content asks for useful alt text; 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) expects readable color contrast. Together they ensure images and text still communicate when visuals fail or vision varies.
- Operable: People must be able to find and use things. 2.4.6 Headings and Labels rewards clear, descriptive headings; keyboard-friendly navigation pushes toward predictable movement through a page.
- Understandable: Content should read cleanly and behave as expected. 3.3.1 Error Identification favors messages that say what went wrong and how to fix it—perfect for forms and flows.
- Robust: Code should work with current and future tech. 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value is where semantic HTML shines, helping assistive technologies reliably understand controls and their states.
You don’t need to memorize the spec. Use POUR as a short, practical lens while you write and review: if a decision helps someone perceive, operate, understand, or reliably use the page, you’re moving in the right direction—and you’ll have the checkpoints to prove it. It’s not meant to slow you down; it’s there to turn good intentions into repeatable habits that make accessible web content easier to ship.

Ensure Your Words Work—Not Just Look Right

Use tools to catch patterns. Use people to confirm meaning.

Helpful tools:
- Accessibility checkers (like WAVE or Google Lighthouse) surface common issues early.
- Readability and contrast tools help you tune language and color choices.
Manual checks:
- Try a screen reader (NVDA on Windows, VoiceOver on macOS).
- Navigate with a keyboard only. Can you reach and use every control?
- When possible, invite feedback from people with diverse abilities.
Make it repeatable:
- Keep a short pre-publish checklist: heading order, meaningful links, alt text added, language attribute set, clear form labels and errors.
- Schedule content accessibility reviews so improvements stick. This is how you keep accessible web content strong as pages, teams, and priorities change.
Accessible Content Is Good Content—Let’s Get You There

You don’t have to fix everything at once—just make the next thing better. A clearer title here, a stronger alt text there, a caption polished before it goes live. Small improvements stack up fast, and your audience feels the difference.

As you roll out a new product, kick off a seasonal sale, or hit publish on a blog, take a gentle pause: Does the page read easily? Do the links explain themselves? Will someone using a screen reader get the same story as everyone else? That quiet check-in becomes a habit, and that habit becomes consistency—without slowing your team down. Over time, those small, steady choices turn into a recognizable voice: thoughtful, trustworthy, and human.

If you’d like a partner to help keep that momentum, 216digital is here. We can share simple checklists, coach your team, and set up light-touch reviews so every release ships with confidence. Schedule an ADA briefing with us, and let’s make the next launch your clearest one yet—then repeat it with every product, sale, and post.
Greg McNeil

September 19, 2025

How-to Guides

Accessibility, Content Creators, Content Writing, How-to, Web Accessibility, Website Accessibility
WCAG Tips Every Content Creator Should Know
When you’re creating content for the web, accessibility might not always be the first thing on your mind. You’re busy crafting engaging stories, writing catchy headlines, or finding the perfect image. But here’s the deal: ignoring accessibility can limit your audience and potentially land you in legal trouble. That’s where Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) comes in—and yes, it’s easier than you think.

Let’s break down what WCAG is, why it matters for content creators, and how you can make your content shine for everyone.

What is WCAG, and Why Should You Care?

WCAG stands for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, but don’t let the formal name intimidate you. These guidelines are essentially a roadmap for making websites, apps, and digital content usable for everyone—whether someone has a disability or not. Developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), WCAG focuses on four key principles: making content perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust (POUR). Think of it as a checklist to ensure your site is accessible to as many people as possible.

It’s all about ensuring that everyone, regardless of their abilities, can engage with your website. Sounds important, right? It is.

And it’s not just for developers! WCAG applies to everyone involved in building a website, including content creators. Accessible content expands your reach, enhances the user experience, boosts your site’s SEO, and helps you avoid potential legal pitfalls. In short, accessibility isn’t a chore—it’s a win-win.

The Benefits of Accessible Content

Expand Your Audience Reach

Did you know that 28.7% of adults in the U.S.—that’s over 61 million people—live with a disability? Globally, this number jumps to over 1 billion people, or 16% of the world’s population. Aligning your content with WCAG opens the door to a massive audience that often faces barriers online. Accessible content ensures these users can interact with your brand just as easily as anyone else.

Boost SEO

Accessible content improves your website’s visibility. For example, alternative text for images helps search engines understand your visuals, while properly structured headings and clear navigation improve crawlability. Research shows that websites meeting accessibility standards often rank higher in search engine results, giving you an edge over competitors who overlook these guidelines.

Enhance User Experience

Accessibility benefits everyone—not just those with disabilities. A study by Forrester Research found that improving user experience can increase conversion rates by up to 200%. Features like video captions, clear navigation, and legible fonts make it easier for users of all abilities to engage with your content.

Avoid Legal Risks

Lawsuits related to digital accessibility are on the rise. In the U.S., 4,605 web accessibility lawsuits were filed under the ADA in 2023—a nearly 13% increase from the previous year. Following WCAG not only protects your brand from potential litigation but also demonstrates your commitment to inclusivity.

Practical WCAG Tips for Content Creators

Making your content accessible doesn’t require a complete overhaul. Small, thoughtful changes can make a huge difference. Let’s dive into some practical tips for content creators, with expanded advice to make each step actionable.

Use Proper Headings

Headings aren’t just for organizing your thoughts—they’re essential for accessibility. Structured headings (H1, H2, H3, etc.) create a clear hierarchy that helps all users, including those using screen readers, navigate your content easily.
- Start with a single H1 as the main title of your page.
- Use H2 for main sections and H3 for subsections. Avoid skipping levels (e.g., going from H1 directly to H3).
- Write headings that are concise but descriptive. For example, “Tips for Accessible Content” is better than “Tips.”
Properly structured headings also improve SEO by signaling the importance of your content to search engines.

Add Alternative Text for Images

Alternative text (alt text) describes the content of an image for users who can’t see it. This helps screen reader users and also boosts SEO by making your images searchable.
- Be specific and relevant. Instead of “Picture of a cake,” use “A three-tiered chocolate cake with white icing and red roses.”
- Avoid saying “Image of” or “Picture of”—screen readers already indicate it’s an image.
- If an image is decorative and doesn’t convey critical information, use a null alt attribute (alt=" ") so screen readers can skip it.
Alt text should fit naturally into your content, adding context without overloading users with unnecessary details.

Color Contrast

Color contrast is vital for users with visual impairments, such as color blindness or low vision. Text that blends into the background is difficult to read, even for users without disabilities.
- Use a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for regular text and 3:1 for large text (as per WCAG SC 1.4.3).
- Avoid using color alone to convey meaning. For instance, instead of relying on red text to indicate an error, include a descriptive message like “Please enter a valid email address.”
- Test your designs with online contrast checkers to ensure compliance.
Strong contrast not only aids accessibility but also improves readability and engagement for all users.

Choose Accessible Fonts

The typeface you use plays a significant role in how accessible your content is. Some fonts are more legible than others, particularly for users with visual impairments or learning disabilities.
- Opt for sans-serif fonts like Arial, Verdana, or Tahoma, which are easier to read on screens.
- Ensure your font size is large enough—typically at least 16px for body text.
- Avoid excessive italics or decorative fonts that may be hard to read.
Accessible fonts contribute to a cleaner, more professional appearance that benefits all users.

Write Descriptive Links

Vague link text like “Click here” or “Learn more” can be confusing for screen reader users. Instead, use descriptive link text that tells users where the link will take them.
- Good example: “Read our guide on WCAG compliance for content creators.”
- Bad example: “Click here.”
- Ensure links make sense out of context. Some users navigate sites by jumping between links, so each one should provide value on its own.
Descriptive links also make your content easier to scan and improve your site’s SEO.

Create Accessible Tables

Tables are useful for presenting data but can become a nightmare for accessibility if not designed properly.
- Use headers (<th> tags) for column or row titles. This helps screen readers understand the table structure.
- Avoid merging cells or using tables for layout purposes—this confuses assistive technologies.
- Include captions to explain the table’s purpose. For example, “Table showing monthly website traffic for 2023.”
Accessible tables ensure your data is comprehensible for all users, not just those using traditional browsers.

Caption Your Videos

Video captions aren’t just helpful for people who are deaf or hard of hearing—they’re valuable for anyone in a noisy or quiet environment.
- Include both closed captions (user-controlled) and open captions (always visible).
- Ensure captions are synced accurately with the dialogue or sounds.
- For additional accessibility, provide a transcript that includes all spoken words, sound effects, and meaningful visual elements.
Well-captioned videos increase engagement, improve retention, and align with WCAG guidelines.

Use Plain Language

Accessible content isn’t just about design—it’s also about the words you choose. Writing in plain language ensures your content is easy to understand for a broad audience, including users with cognitive disabilities.
- Break complex ideas into smaller, simpler sentences.
- Define jargon or technical terms the first time they appear.
- Use bullet points and lists to organize information clearly.
Plain language isn’t dumbing down your content; it’s making it more approachable and impactful.

Monitor Accessibility Regularly

Creating accessible content isn’t a one-and-done task. Websites are dynamic, with new pages, updates, and features being added constantly. This means your accessibility efforts need regular check-ins to ensure compliance with WCAG standards. Neglecting this can leave you vulnerable to accessibility gaps, which not only alienate users but could also lead to legal risks.

Thankfully, tools like a11y.Radar make monitoring accessibility easier and more effective. This specialized service continuously scans your site for issues, giving you a clear, actionable picture of your site’s compliance status.

Final Thoughts

Accessibility doesn’t have to be overwhelming, and you don’t have to tackle it alone. With WCAG as your guide and the right support, you can create content that reaches more people, performs better in search engines, and provides an exceptional user experience. But ensuring accessibility is more than a one-time effort—it’s an ongoing process.

That’s where we come in.

At 216digital, we specialize in making web accessibility simple and actionable for content creators just like you. Whether you’re new to WCAG or need help fine-tuning your content strategy, our ADA briefing is the perfect place to start.

Schedule your ADA briefing today, and let us show you how to make your content accessible, impactful, and compliant—all while reaching a broader audience and safeguarding your business. Accessibility is an opportunity, and together, we can help you unlock it.
Greg McNeil

November 26, 2024

WCAG Compliance

Accessibility, Content Creators, Content Writing, SEO, WCAG, WCAG Compliance, Web Accessibility

Can User-Generated Content Trigger an ADA Demand Letter?

What User-Generated Content Is and Where It Shows Up

Light UGC Explained

Rich UGC and Accessibility

Structural UGC and Exposure

Where User-Generated Content Lives (and Why Placement Matters)

How User-Generated Content Factors Into Website Accessibility Complaints

Responsibility for UGC Accessibility Issues

How WCAG Evaluates UGC on Pages

How User-Generated Content Can Create Accessibility Barriers

Barriers From Inaccessible UGC Tools

Foreseeable Accessibility Failures

When User-Generated Content Stops Key Tasks

How to Make User-Generated Content Accessible by Design

Build Accessible UGC Submission Tools

Prompt Users for Necessary Details

Limit Risky Formatting Options

Managing Rich Media Accessibility

Maintaining Accessible User-Generated Content Over Time

Making User-Generated Content a Strength, Not a Liability

Say More with Accessible Web Content

Plain Language Is the Heart of Accessible Web Content

Make Your Page Easy to Scan—By People and Tools

Links and Images That Strengthen Accessible Web Content

Effective Alt Text

Accessible Audio and Video for Every Situation

Guidance That Doesn’t Assume Vision or Memory

Formatting That Keeps Accessible Web Content Readable

Why These Techniques Matter

Ensure Your Words Work—Not Just Look Right

Accessible Content Is Good Content—Let’s Get You There

WCAG Tips Every Content Creator Should Know

What is WCAG, and Why Should You Care?

The Benefits of Accessible Content

Expand Your Audience Reach

Boost SEO

Enhance User Experience

Avoid Legal Risks

Practical WCAG Tips for Content Creators

Use Proper Headings

Add Alternative Text for Images

Color Contrast

Choose Accessible Fonts

Write Descriptive Links

Create Accessible Tables

Caption Your Videos

Use Plain Language

Monitor Accessibility Regularly

Final Thoughts